Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

On March 26, 2019, at around 23:35, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports from the subway line C, the subway line C, located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and (b) received a demand for confirmation of personal information from the border E and the border F, belonging to the Seoul Mine Police Station D Zone D, and dispatched to the site on several occasions; (c) the Defendant breadddd the above E and F several times, and assaulted the shoulder part of the above E on a drinking basis.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of G, E, and F;

1. Photographs concerning damage to property;

1. 112 reported case list;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (victim F submitted images);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment prescribed for the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties against E by police officers with heavier rank);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [The defendant's defense counsel shall claim that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder by drinking alcohol at the time of the crime in this case. However, in light of all circumstances, such as the background, means, and circumstances after the crime in this case, which are acknowledged by each evidence in the holding, the defendant cannot be deemed to be in a state of lacking the ability or decision-making ability to discern things under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime in this case. Accordingly, the above assertion by the defense counsel shall not be accepted.] The sentencing guidelines are not

The defendant assaulted victimized police officers in the course of performing their duties to interfere with the legitimate execution of their duties, and the liability for such crime is not against the law.

However, the defendant is not a party.