logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.07.18 2018노1241
자동차관리법위반등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, with the cooperation of two workers working in the Dong E (hereinafter “the Deceased”), who was working in the Defendant’s management C, allowed the Defendant to use the registered Oral Land E (hereinafter “the registered Oral Land E”) owned by the Defendant to take out and repair the D Oral Land E (hereinafter “the registered Oral Land E”) out of his office at his office. Accordingly, the Deceased removed the number plate of the registered Oral Land E from the registration of the instant case and operated it on the Oral Land E, while leaving the said office and leaving the said office, and thereafter filed a complaint against the Defendant on each of the instant crimes. The Defendant did not have operated the registered Oral Land E after removing the number plate of the registered Oral Land, which was removed from it.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted the charged facts of this case is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in the lower court’s determination as to the assertion of mistake of facts, and ① The deceased 112 phone calls, thereby resulting in any arbitra in the registration of this case.

Saturdays discarded its number plate, and reported it to the effect that it is not operated by attaching it to the instant unregistered Oraltob, and thereafter stated it to the same effect at the police. ② The Defendant, at the police station, reported the instant registered Oraltob to the Deceased’s house on August 2017 and reported it to the Deceased’s house, and ② The Defendant, at the police station, reported it to the Deceased’s house, “The Defendant reported the instant registered Oraltob to the Deceased’s house on the paths from August 2017 when he went into the Deceased’s house, and reported it to the Deceased’s disposal of water as he did not pay taxes on the registration Oraltob, and it was old.”

arrow