logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2015.12.11 2015가단12668
손해배상(기)
Text

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 66,907,657 as well as 5% per annum from February 23, 2014 to December 11, 2015 and the next day.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

On October 18, 2012, the Defendant completed the instant construction from around C (the husband of the Plaintiff) to February 2013 and from around January 2013 to around December 2013, 2012, the construction of the instant land was completed by executing the yellow soil of four square meters (hereinafter “instant construction”).

C After completing approval for the use of the said detached house on September 10, 2013, C used the instant yellow bank from around that time. On February 23, 2014, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the addiction to the sulfur oxide, low-carbon cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Bribery, food disorder, and spathal marine, etc., which were addicted to the floor of the instant Yellow C, and the Plaintiff was addicted to the sulfur oxide, and was addicted to it, and was addicted to it, requiring treatment for at least six months.

(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Plaintiff received hospitalized treatment from February 23, 2014 to January 22, 2015 due to the said injury. From January 22, 2015, the Plaintiff spent KRW 26,429,620 as medical expenses until the time of the instant lawsuit.

The Defendant, due to the instant accident, sentenced to a fine of KRW 5,00,000 for the crime of injury caused by occupational negligence in this Court case, and appealed as Incheon District Court 2015No727, but the appeal was dismissed on September 10, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

[Reasons] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 27 (including the number of branch numbers), the facts of recognition as to the existence of liability for damages of the whole pleadings, and the evidence and the whole purport of the pleadings as follows. In other words, the defendant does not use any objective measuring device in the process of performing the yellow soil of this case, and merely check whether the postponement by the arche or the flusium, which occurred from the arche, flows into the territory of the yellow soil of this case, on a subjective basis, and check out whether it was flowing into the territory of the yellow soil of this case.

arrow