logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원마산지원 2020.07.15 2018가합100953
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 29,715,296 with respect to the Plaintiff, and the period from November 28, 2015 to July 15, 2020.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Defendant B’s permanent residence D with the trade name “E” (hereinafter “instant pension”).

2) Defendant C is a person operating the instant pentle, and Defendant C is a person who completed the construction of the instant pentle (F, G, and H) by being awarded a contract with Defendant B for the construction of the instant pentle (F, G, and H). 2) The Plaintiff is a guest of the instant pentle.

B. 1) On November 28, 2015, the Plaintiff, along with the daily cryptian addiction accident in the instant pen, was involved in the “F” room in the yellow soil bank within the instant pention (hereinafter “instant yellow soil bank”).

(2) Defendant B was able to be able to fluorize in the instant yellow bank for heating, and Defendant B was able to fluorize the womb of the instant yellow bank for heating. (2) The Plaintiff, while locked in the yellow earth bank of this case, was exposed to harmful gases, exposed to the wind that flown into the gluor, by exposure to the harmful gas into the gluor, thereby suffering from an injury of the gluoral dluoral dluoral brain damage (hereinafter “the instant accident”). The Plaintiff suffered from a fluoral cerebral cerebral disease due to the fluoral symptoms.

3) In the process of performing the instant yellow soil bank, Defendant C did not fully secure the passage necessary for smooth emission of gas (i.e., a first-hand road). When constructing a stone in the said yellow soil bank, Defendant C did not dispose only part of the lower part of the part of the lower part connecting a wooden pole and did so, thereby causing a gap between the lower part and the lower part of the lower part, and did not thoroughly construct it as a material where the interior satise is within the inner satise, but did not thoroughly this. Defendant B did not repair the satise in the satise of the instant yellow soil. Defendant B was aware of the defects of the instant yellow soil bank, but did not repair the satise without timely repair. Defendant B did not take measures to prevent the Plaintiff, a guest of the instant resort, from being exposed to harmful gas by checking the gas circulation, etc. prior to leaving the satise., and did not take measures to prevent the Plaintiff from being exposed to the harmful gas.

arrow