(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2017.12.06 2017고정423

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2017.12.06 2017고정423

재물손괴

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 12, 2017, around 02:57, the Defendant destroyed the part of the rocketing car owned by the victim D, which was parked at the above ground parking lot of 109, North-gu C apartment 109, North-gu, North-gu, North-gu, Seoul, in order to damage the repair cost of 1,98,228 won, including fences, by using the impulgic tool.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. A report on internal investigation (related to photographing the site and damaged area), and a report on internal investigation (related to the confirmation of CCTV in an apartment complex);

1. An investigation report (the details of the statement at the time of initial appearance of the suspect A), an investigation report (related to changes in the attitude of the suspect A), an investigation report (A mobile route and analysis of damaged vehicles), an investigation report (Attachment of a estimate), an investigation report (verification of the force to harm or harm vehicles against the victim), and an investigation report (related to whether or not the victim's other victim's other victim's access is sealed);

1. The CCTV video image (the defendant and his defense counsel had a fact that the defendant had the surroundings around the damaged vehicle at the time of the instant case, but did not damage the vehicle;

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence, namely, (i) a flag in a straight line between flag and flaged by the driver’s flag of the vehicle, and (ii) a flag in a straight line from the back flag to the front flag of the vehicle to the front flag even on the opposite side of the vehicle; (iii) in light of the damaged shape, it appears that the flag intentionally created the flag on the suspended vehicle rather than that occurred in the vehicle operation process; and (iv) the flag of the straight line following the flag’s deblag, which led to the flag’s deblag, coincide with the flag line that the Defendant returned to the damaged vehicle at the time of the instant case; and (v) the Defendant demanded the victim’s contact by

However, CCTV images are shown.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.05.09 2017고정879

-서울남부지방법원 2018.10.02 2018고정43

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.08.13 2013고정74

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.20 2015고정4864

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.05 2018나44311