Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Criminal facts

On July 24, 2017, around 22:50, the Defendant parked on the delivery of the victim C ( South, 29 years old) the amount of the DMW car at the front of the cargo office located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangseo-gu 112, Kimpo Airport, and on the front of the cargo office located in the domestic cargo office of the Kimpo Airport, on the ground that it obstructs traffic, the Defendant left the vehicle as her hand, followed the top behind the vehicle more than 2:3 times.

Therefore, whether the victim is "Isn't get off the vehicle," and why is the other side of the vehicle.

“The victim resisted “,” and committed assaulting the victim’s chest on his body on the ground that the victim was satisfing tobacco before, two hand, and pushed the victim’s chest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment shall be determined in light of the various circumstances revealed in the records and trial process of the instant case, including the details leading to the Defendant to commit the instant crime and the degree of assault.

Parts of innocence

1. On July 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 22:50 on July 24, 2017, the summary of the facts charged: (b) around 112 of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Hayn-ro 112, and (c) the victim C ( South, 29 years old) parked on the delivery of the DoW car volume; (d) on the ground that it obstructs traffic, the Defendant destroyed property in the market price by means of causing a flick, glick, glick, and a glick, glick, glick, and a glick, glick, to the right side of the vehicle.

2. The Defendant, on the date and time indicated in the facts charged, and at the place, parked a vehicle in India, thereby hindering the passage of the vehicle, thereby reducing the vehicle. The Defendant, after having taken the front gate of the vehicle, did not have a blickly flickly flicked the vehicle by hand, and did not have a flickly flickly flicked on the vehicle surface.