logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.09 2019고단117
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(성적목적공공장소침입)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes;

A. On March 7, 2018, at around 13:57, the Defendant entered the “C” building located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, with a view to taking the studio into a camera, female toilets located on the third floor of the building.

Accordingly, the defendant invadeds on public use places used by many unspecified persons for the purpose of meeting sexual desire.

B. On September 9, 2018, around 17:40 on September 17, 2018, the Defendant entered the women’s toilet located on the second floor of the above building in order to take a Kamera with the appearance that women look at at a Kamera.

Accordingly, the defendant invadeds on public use places used by many unspecified persons for the purpose of meeting sexual desire.

2. Around September 17, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Amerass, etc. of Sexual Crimes) taken a protruding screen image on September 17, 2018, by entering a female toilet on the second floor of the pertinent building in order to take a Kameras in order for women to see the appearance of melting a studio, and by inserting a cell phone (Evidence No. 1) into a female toilet on the second floor of the said building in an open space above the female toilet column, the Defendant taken a protruding screen.

In addition, from May 17, 2016 to September 9, 2018, the Defendant taken the body of female victims at least 88 times, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame against his will.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (in the case of the second fact on the date of the fourth trial, on the date of the fourth trial);

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Prosecution investigation report (in cases of attaching data to USB storage devices as a result of digital evidence analysis of cellular phones used by suspects);

1. Handphones of video images in which the suspect taken the image of the victim by means of a Handphone;

1. One set of No. 6S. (No. 1) seized Audio 6S law.

arrow