A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 5, 2014, at around 18:30 on August 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) francing a motor vehicle, such as drinking alcohol at “Dju shop” operated by “Dju shop,” which was operated by “Djudo,” but not calculating the drinking value; and (b) recommended the Defendant to pay and return the drinking value by F of F on one occasion, who was called out after receiving the above C’s report.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officer's 112 reporting and withdrawal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and C;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Compelling of Duties) and the basic area (6-1-4 months) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties (the Decision of Sentence] (the Decision of Sentence] is against the defendant. The defendant has no criminal records other than a fine once, and the defendant has no other criminal records other than the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment