Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around early 201, around early 201, by receiving a proposal from E, a technical director of D redevelopment and rearrangement project association (hereinafter referred to as "development project association"), to request a creative construction business operator to take the creative construction work at the site of redevelopment project, and, upon receiving a proposal to request water color, E is a technical director of D&A, who works for F in F in the non-cafeteria of the trade name near the Seoul Black-dong Central University in September 201, and E is a technical director of D&A to F in F.

In order to select H's creative services by speaking in G, a Si public corporation, the Si public corporation, the Si public corporation, and the Si public corporation dealing with H's creative services, the Si public corporation (hereinafter the above I) will have the Si public corporation receive the Si public services.

However, in the process, it was required that the activity expenses be required, and that B request that the activity expenses be KRW 50 million.

F that complies with the above requirement was a past work partner around September 30, 201.

J requested K, L, and M, a business partner, to transfer the sum of KRW 50 million to the post office account (Account Number:N) in the name of B from his account.

1. Defendant B received a remittance of KRW 50 million in total to the post office account under one’s name around September 30, 201, as above.

As a result, the Defendant received money and valuables from F for the purpose of committing the act of giving F bribe.

2. On the same day, the Defendant was found to have received KRW 50 million in cash from B in the vicinity of the post office Shindong-dong, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul.

As a result, the Defendant received money and valuables from B for the purpose of accepting a bribe in F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant B in the second public trial record;

1. Part of the first prosecution examination protocol against E;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor to the prosecution against J,O, P, Q, and R;

1. Copies of the text of the Seoul Western District Court Decision 2017 Gohap78;

1. A copy of the examination report (B, F) of the Seoul Western District Court 2017 High High 78 Examination Report;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to certificates of electronic financial transfer results, and copies of payments;

1. Article 133 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment