Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 2015, Defendant A created an incentive to the effect that “I’s executives of the I’s Housing Development and Improvement Project Association shall not be entitled to the minimum amount of resettlement under the law, but shall be paid KRW 50,000,000 to G without the authority of H, and that “G shall have offered KRW 2,00,000,000 to H under its pretext for the payment,” while sending it to approximately 712 members of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E 2nd floor F Office, and the fact was not clearly proven that there was a crime of occupational embezzlement and bribe grant to victims G and H, etc., thereby impairing the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On November 2, 2015, Defendant B posted a statement to the effect that, although there was no clear proof that the facts were suspected of occupational embezzlement against the victim G and H, and of giving a bribe, etc., Defendant B damaged the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false facts by registering a written complaint filed against the victims by violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Offense of Occupational Breach of Trust) with the victim as it was attached to the column of the official notice / [F]. “H of the I Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association’s officer H was falsely unauthorized, and without any authority, paid the minimum relocation cost to the non-qualified union members G, and G was offered a bribe to conceal this, and submitted relevant evidence to the prosecution.”

3. On November 16, 2015, Defendant C: (a) although there was no clear proof of the charge of occupational breach of trust, etc. against the victim H; (b) even though the fact was not clearly proven, Defendant C’s executive officers of the I Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association determined an excessive amount of the cost of removal in breach of his/her duties; and (c) concluded a contract with the I Housing Redevelopment and Development Project Association’s executive officers H obtained money by falsely setting the cost of removal.