logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.03.18 2015가단43497
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 6,442,379 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from May 27, 2015 to March 18, 2016, and the following.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In fact, the Defendant, as an operator of the aquaculture C (3.71 tons, FRP, Soloin Overseas Agency 200 E) of the aquaculture management vessel C, operated the seed and seedling business of the unspawn in the name of E in the name of Jeonnamdo-gun D from Jeonnamdo-do, and the Plaintiff was an employee of E as a shipbuilding yard.

On September 20, 2014, the Defendant confirmed the flooding of part of the unclaimed vessels due to the rise of water level under Article 8, which was laid down with the Plaintiff in E’s U. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.

The defendant was well aware of the C’s structure as the operator of C.

At the time, it was difficult to secure the view at night, and there was a risk of fire in the event of the use of oil with the oil vapor that was generated from fuel distribution inside the sealed hull.

Therefore, the defendant, accompanied by the defendant, has a duty of care to inform the plaintiff of the structure and risk factors of the hull in advance and to prevent accidents caused by fire, fall, etc. during the plaintiff's work.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and had the Plaintiff conduct the work of confirming the flooding status of the C hull at night without any attention to the Plaintiff, and caused the Plaintiff to fluoral fluor who was on the part of the port side of the C to check the inundation status of the C hull, and caused the Plaintiff to fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor who was on board the C’s port side hull in order to check the inundation status of the inside side of the C’s port side hull, and 30 L, which was on board the C’s port side hull, and was staying inside the sealed hull due to a fuel distribution, to dluter fluor C’s fuel flow, and the Plaintiff was fluor C’s fluor fluor C’s fluor fluor fluor flus

【Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 5, and 6 (including branch numbers if there are virtual numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)

b) evidence Nos. 2 and 5, and the purport of the entire pleadings;

arrow