1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts to be cited or added as follows, and the part to be emphasized by the court of first instance or additionally claimed by the plaintiff, and thus, citing it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

(2) The Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial does not significantly differ from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial, and even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance trial and the first instance trial were examined, the judgment of the first instance court that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable. [In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement of evidence Nos. 3, 4, and 13 in the 6th instance judgment of the first instance court, D is a contract officer belonging to the information technology team in the knowledge and information service, and E is a contract officer belonging to the planning and budget team in the information service, and E is a contract officer belonging to the planning and budget team in the trade and trade headquarters, and F cannot have research achievements in light of the contract research officer belonging to the trade and trade headquarters trade policy team, the examination of research results in the appointment of the Intervenor is unnecessary even if the Intervenor appears to have been reviewed.”

In the 8th judgment of the court of first instance, the 9th " Current status of implementation" is regarded as the " current status of implementation and task".

On the 16th page of the first instance judgment, the following provisions shall be added to the first instance judgment:

Article 13 (Utilization of Results of Evaluation) The evaluation results shall be reflected in the personnel management of all kinds of personnel of the employee and the evaluation person may, if necessary, point out a verbal defect to the evaluation person and urge him/her to make corrections.

Article 14 (Confidentiality) The rating table shall be in full secrecy.

In any case, the extraction, duplication, or perusal of contents shall be prohibited.

From 17 pages 17 of the first instance judgment, the following provisions shall be added to the first instance judgment:

Article 11 (Rules) Matters not prescribed in these Rules shall be prescribed by the Institute.