The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable for the lower court’s imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment).

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the following: (a) the defendant was present at an investigative agency only in the framework of the crime and led to the confession of the crime; (b) the defendant was not subject to punishment for the same kind of crime other than a fine imposed several times for the crime;

On the other hand, the crime of this case is committed by a criminal who obstructs the proper criminal justice action of the state, and further, as a military unit list of C, the defendant, who is the representative of D, is sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Acts during the Suspension of Execution of Imprisonment with prison labor, and the above suspended sentence is invalidated for a long time, and D's whereabouts is unknown, even though D's escape is aware that it is a situation that the crime is very serious.

In full view of the various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, including the aforementioned various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the motive and consequence of the instant crime, the means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.