The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (fine 4,000,000) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant shows the appearance of realizing and opposing his mistake, the fact that the police officer did not know that he was injured by the request of pro-Japanese A, and the fact that the police officer committed the crime of capital flight with the knowledge of the crime, and the fact that the police officer should support his family most recently, is favorable.

However, in light of the following circumstances, the crime of escape of an offender is a crime interfering with the State's criminal justice action because it is difficult to find substantial truth in criminal cases, and there is a strict punishment. According to the statement (Evidence No. 29 pages) prepared and submitted by the defendant himself/herself, the punishment of the court below is too heavy, in view of the following: (a) the defendant merely stated himself/herself as a driver; (b) the circumstances leading up to the escape by taking out and driving a vehicle; (c) the circumstances leading up to the escape by avoiding control; and (d) the name and contact details of the persons concerned; and (e) the investigative agency made a

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed by applying Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.