A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[Majority Relationship] The defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of business affairs at the Gwangju District Court on February 8, 2017 and the same year

6.9. The execution of the above punishment was completed.

[2] On June 18, 2017, from around 14:15 to around 16:30 of the same day, the Defendant expressed the Defendant’s desire to “E” restaurant operated by the victim D (n, 40 years of age) located in Yong-gun C, which is located in Yong-gun C, to the employees, that “the Defendant spits tobacco on the floor and spit it on the horse floor,” and that “the Defendant spits tobacco on the floor, spit it on the horse floor, and spit it on the horse floor.”

Dr. Scar v. Scar Habus Habk

“Along with the public interest,” the public interest and the public interest and the public interest and the public interest and the public interest and the public interest and the public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and public interest and interest

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous relationship: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (verification of repeated crimes and reporting on attachment of judgments of the same kind of case), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the personal confinement status;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [the scope of recommended punishment] Article 35 of the Criminal Act [the reasons for sentencing of category 1 (Interference with Business) [one month to eight months] [the person who has been specially mitigated]] / Non-guilty of punishment / the same type of repeated crime (the decision of sentence] / The defendant and the agreed victim want to have the front wife, the victim's cherbing, and the degree of alcohol dependence on the suffering from the crime seems to have an advantage of the crime, or there is a history of having been punished several times for the same crime, and it is necessary to sentence the crime to be committed because it does not exceed ten days after having been sentenced to punishment for the same crime.

The above circumstances and other circumstances.