1. The Defendant: (a) to Plaintiff A, KRW 331,732,256, KRW 41,157,094, and each of the above amounts to Plaintiff B and C, respectively; and (b) on November 24, 2012.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff A and the network D are legally married and legal children, and the deceased E, the plaintiff B, the plaintiff C, and the network F are children of the plaintiff and the network D.

B. On November 24, 2012, the network D, E, and F (hereinafter “the network”) stopped at one lane in Seoul located at the 366.7km away from the front knive road of the city of Ansan, where the network D, E, and F (hereinafter “W”) was driven by the network G, driving a H SPP car on the side of the city of Busan, which was driven by the network G, to the Seoul bank (hereinafter “PP”) and the JW car driven by the network I on the side of Busan, which was driven by the networkI (hereinafter “PP car”).

However, around that time, Non-party K driving a L New Trucking Bus (hereinafter “afluor”) and driving the said expressway with approximately 105 km speed, did not discover the above vehicles parked due to the preceding traffic accident, and shocked the said clan on the front side of the sea-melting vehicle, and continued to attack the above ice G, the driver of the above Switzerland car who was a driver of the above Switzerland car in order to take into account the preceding traffic accident situation.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

In the instant accident, the deceased E, F, etc. were killed due to multiple cerebral brain damage at each site, and the deceased D, around November 25, 2012, died due to cerebral cerebral cerebral sis at the Aju University Hospital located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 164.

On the other hand, the defendant is an insurer who runs the insurance business, and has concluded the automobile insurance contract with the owner of the vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including Serial Nos. 1 and 2), the court's fact inquiry into Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The following circumstances revealed in light of the evidence presented before the occurrence of liability for damages and the purport of the entire pleadings, namely, ① the time of occurrence of the instant accident, are as follows.