beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with A high speed bus (hereinafter, the Plaintiff’s vehicle) with B gender car and C SP car with each other.
B. On November 24, 2012, 04: (a) at a point of 366.7 km in Seoul (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident location”) located in the border road (four-lane) in the front fluoral fluoral fluoral fluorg (hereinafter referred to as the “fluoral fluorial fluor”) where the driver of the instant accident was stopped by causing a sudden accident (hereinafter referred to as the “pre-accident”); (b) D, who is a gluor driver of the instant accident, driven a scke car, driven the scke car, E, f, G, etc. out of the vehicle to grasp the situation of the accident.
C. On November 24, 2012, H driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle on November 24, 2012, and driving the instant accident site at the speed of about 105 km/h from the Busan bank to the Seoul bank, due to the negligence of neglecting the front-down city while neglecting to drive the instant accident at the speed of about 105 km, H caused an accident of shocking the ice-ray car (e.g., a driver E, a passenger, a passenger F, and G on the road at the same time (hereinafter “instant accident”).
Due to the accident in this case, D, a driver of scar driving car, died in both the scene of accident outside the vehicle, E, Dong F, and G, and I, a driver of scar driving car in the vehicle, during treatment.
E. On March 18, 2013, the Defendant filed a claim against the Plaintiff for the deliberation of the dispute over the reimbursement of automobile insurance with respect to the medical expenses of I who was a winner of the SP car car, based on the mutual agreement and implementation rules on the deliberation of the dispute over the reimbursement of automobile insurance, and the committee for deliberation of the dispute over the reimbursement of indemnity amount (the committee for deliberation) decided on March 18, 2013 as 40% including the Defendant’s gender negligence ratio, and 60%