1. The Intervenor’s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are borne by the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

purport.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence

【Additional Part 1 at the bottom of the 7th page “A prosecution was instituted.” Next, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the Intervenor on June 12, 2019 to a two-year verdict of suspended execution in the 8th month of imprisonment, and the Intervenor appealed and is still pending in the appeal court at the present time.”

11. Each testimony of this Court N andO shall be added after the 8th page “the foregoing facts”.

After the 11th 18th 18th 201, the intervenor added “(the intervenor was present at the Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee on January 7, 2014 and recognized this fact).”

12 Myeon 9's "B 14, 15" shall be raised to "B 14, 15, 21, 22, 23."

13.On the 11th page “The review has been conducted”, the following shall be added: “4. It is difficult to deem that the publication of Part 2 (including Part 1 or more per week) of this SCRI thesis is either impossible or excessively difficult in light of the Intervenor’s academic background or qualities.”

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.