1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The defendant in the 8th page 8 is moving "the defendant in the second page" to "the defendant in the case of defendant D."

8. The content of the 15th executive call shall be changed to "the number of pages shall include each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)."

10. The following shall be added to the two pages:

On June 10, 2014, the date following the remittance date of the above loan amounting to KRW 2 billion, Defendant D, with a view to securing the above loan, was set as a second priority collateral with respect to M& owned land at KRW 2 billion.

[Attachment 10] The “registration of the instant mortgage establishment” in the 10th parallel 5th parallel 5th parallel 5th parallel 5th parallel 10th parallel 10th parallel 10th parallel 10th parallel 10th parallel 12th parallel 12th parallel 829,201,500 won was added to “individually notified land price” following the 13th parallel 11th parallel 13th parallel 13th parallel 13th parallel 209. Defendant D’s initial purchase contract was concluded but revoked on August 10, 2015. Accordingly, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff again concluded a sales contract with the purchase price of KRW 3 billion was inevitable to secure the right to use and benefit from the instant land, and thus, it is difficult to view that the payment of the purchase price was made in lieu of the purchase price of the instant commercial building.

The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.