A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The facts leading to medical treatment and custody and the fact that the defendant and the respondent for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter referred to as the "defendants") lack the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a mental division. At around 1:00 on April 5, 2013, the victim D (the age of 78) who was living in the front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (the age of c.), without any justifiable reason, brought the victim DNA (the age of 78), who was living in the front of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to have him/her go beyond the control of the victim, and caused the victim to go beyond the control of the victim's hand and the bridge that the victim could not know the number of days of medical treatment.

[Facts of the grounds for medical treatment and custody] The defendant is a mentally handicapped person who commits the same crime as the facts stated in the judgment in a state that he/she lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a mental fission and needs to receive medical treatment at the facility

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Seized articles, photographs and photographs;

1. As indicated in the judgment, the mental and physical state of the case, necessity of treatment, and risk of recidivism: The above evidence, each fact-finding inquiry, and the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the aforementioned statements, namely, the defendant, from December 16, 2008 to January 14, 2009, was hospitalized in the F Hospital as an unidentified mental disorder in detail, and from August 13, 2010 to October 18 of the same year, respectively, by the F Hospital, respectively. The result of the mental appraisal that the court requested the Public Medical Treatment and Custody Office to provide this case to the Public Medical Treatment and Custody Office, was judged to have been in a state of mental disorder whose ability and decision-making ability has been deteriorated, and that there is a possibility of re-offending without a specialized mental and physical treatment.