A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

A candidate for medical treatment and custody shall be punished by medical treatment and custody.

Criminal facts

The defendant and the requester for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") are not able to discern things or make decisions due to mental division.

1. On December 20, 2013, in front of the “D” located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on December 20, 2013, the Defendant is correct inasmuch as it is obvious that the “victim E is a clerical error in the husband’s written indictment.”

The difference in the bill of indictment in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H through the subway Zone for about 25 minutes is also a clerical error and it is clear that the "Seoul Jung-gu" in the bill of indictment in Jongno-gu is also a clerical error. It is also correct that the difference in the difference in the bill of indictment in the driver's vehicle with his/her own market value of 35 million won and 35 million won is also a clerical error in the back side of the driver's vehicle.

up to I, he was driving a car on the 7km section in front of the world.

As a result, the defendant kidnapped the victim G, who is a minor victim, and stolen the above passenger car in excess of 35 million won at the market price occupied and managed by the victim E.

2. The Defendant is a mentally handicapped person whose sentence is mitigated due to the lack of the ability to discern things or make decisions as above, and thus, has committed a crime corresponding to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment. They need to receive medical treatment at a medical treatment and custody facility and are in danger of recidivism.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement to E and J;

1. Seizure records;

1. Each investigation report (as evidence list Nos. 6 to 9);

1. The necessity of treatment as indicated in the judgment and the risk of recidivism: Each of the above evidence and the accused's written notice of the results of mental appraisal, criminal records, etc., and various circumstances acknowledged by each of the investigation reports, i.e., the defendant's intelligence index to the extent of 70 to 79.