logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.05.15 2014고단118
장물취득등
Text

The crime of the second, third, and fourth of the judgment of the defendant is punished by imprisonment for four months, and the first, second and second of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 22, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch's violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, and the judgment was finalized on the 30th of the same month.

[2014 Highest 118]

1. The Defendant, indicated in paragraph (1) of the crime sight table, posted an advertisement on the Internet Blogs or used goods selling website to the effect that “sloakphones and earphones are inserted”, and then purchased the cell phone from the cellular phone thefter or the mar who contacted with the advertisement at the container, and sold it at the container, which is the stolen.

On June 11, 2013, the Defendant purchased at 230,000 won, even though he was aware of the fact that it was stolen, the sum of KRW 418,550,00 in the total of KRW 198,50,00 in the gallon market value of the gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-based gallon-si

7. By the day of April, 14, as shown in the annexed Table (1) above, all were purchased 5,983,90 won in total from 23 mobile phones lost or stolen by the same method on the same 19 occasions and acquired stolen goods.

[2014 Highest 267]

2. Acquisition of stolens described in the list of crimes;

A. The Defendant posted an advertisement on the Internet Blogs or used article sales website to the effect that “slickphones and learningphones are inserted”, and purchased a mobile phone from a mobile phone thefter or a user who communicates with the Internet, with the cell phone, which is a stolen, and sold it.

On December 2, 2012, the Defendant purchased stolen goods at KRW 40,000 with knowledge of the fact that scar equivalent to KRW 700,000, the market price of the victim G owned by the Defendant, which he had stolen from the victim who reported and contacted the above advertisement, was stolen.

From that time to January 19, 2013, the Defendant is all as described in the [Attachment 1] through 10 list of crimes committed.

arrow