A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 15, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Gwangju District Court on November 15, 2013, and a fine of KRW 4 million for the same crime at the same court on May 19, 2016.

On August 17, 2017, the Defendant driven CMW car at approximately 500 meters away from the Do in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to the general course of business to the general course of business from around 500 meters away from the Do in the vicinity of the hotel, while under the influence of alcohol leveling to 0.079% of the blood alcohol level without obtaining a driver's license.

2. When the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act at the same time, at the same place as the above 1. Paragraph (1) above, controlled as above, and received a demand for driver’s license from the Seo-gu Police Station D Inspector E of the Seo-gu Police Station in Gwangju, the Defendant stated in advance the name and resident registration number of his relative F and used it unlawfully.

3. The Defendant stated the F’s personal information as stated in the foregoing 2. Paragraph 2, and signed the F’s signature in the column for the driver’s seal affixed to the F’s seal on the confirmation column of the driver’s seal in the inquiry report on the result of crackdown on drinking driving with respect to F prepared on a portable information terminal (PDA) from the above circumstances E.

As a result, the Defendant: (a) neglected the driver of the inquiry report as a result of the drinking driving control, which is an electronic record of the certification of facts, for the purpose of making the business process smooth; and (b) caused the above E to transmit the electronic records to the police internal computer network as if they were duly formed.

4. The Defendant who forged a private document or exercised the aforesaid investigation document is named F, a private document stating the names of F in the statement column of the driver’s opinion on the situation of the driver’s statement prepared by the Defendant at the same time and time as the above 1.3, and the F, the personal information of F, etc. stated by the Defendant at the same time and place, and indicating the facts for the purpose of uttering by signing on and following