logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.08.10 2017고단633
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On February 24, 2017, the Defendant, at around 13:30 on February 24, 2017, driven a three-distance crossing in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, and entered a three-distance intersection from the boundary of the new rural village to the boundary of the city.

Since a vehicle is an intersection with each other, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service is a vehicle crossing by reducing the speed or temporarily stopping the vehicle.

Nevertheless, as long as the Defendant neglected the duty at the time of the front and left side, the Defendant received the part on the right side of the victim D (88 S) E-to-land driving from the village room of the procedure to the inside of the ship due to occupational negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer serious injury due to the above occupational negligence by causing mental disorders in recognition function and brain damage for about 10 weeks.

2. The instant facts charged cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. Since the victim expressed his/her intention not to punish the Defendant after filing a prosecution, the instant facts charged are dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow