1. Defendant D Co., Ltd.:

A. From March 11, 2015 to October 27, 2015, Plaintiff A’s KRW 14,310,000 and its amount.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant C is the owner of the construction work for the 6th floor studio-Ba 13th floor on the ground of Busan Shipping Daegu E (hereinafter “instant construction work”) and ordered the instant construction work to the Defendant D, a representative director of which he/she was working, to resign from the office of representative director on October 31, 2013.

After Defendant C resigned from the office of representative director, F, the actual representative director of D, Inc., performed the construction of this case.

B. The Plaintiff A provided the parts of the construction site of this case to the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu.

6,550,000 4,790,790,760,000 1,760,0000,000 6,6146, and 16,750,000 16,750,000 12,550,000 14,310,000 in total for July 6, 2014

C. The details of the Plaintiff A’s labor cost, reimbursement details, and unpaid labor cost are as follows.

(B) The term “payment” refers to the money remitted from Defendant D’s passbook to Plaintiff A’s passbook.

Plaintiff

B Personnel expenses which were not paid as a field director from June 2014 to August 2014 are 7,500,000 won.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including branch numbers for those with a satisfy number), witness G's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to Plaintiff A’s claim

A. The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C filed a claim against Defendant C for payment of unpaid personnel expenses jointly and severally with Defendant C, but the Defendant C is merely the owner of the instant construction project, and according to the witness G’s testimony, F performed the instant construction project from the end of 2013. As such, Defendant C cannot be deemed liable for payment of personnel expenses to the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C is without merit.

B. According to the facts of the above recognition of the claim against Defendant D, Defendant D Co., Ltd., the contractor of the instant construction, is the Plaintiff.