Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 22, 2015, the Defendant driven a CObaon at around 16:20 on October 22, 2015, and proceeded to turn to the right from the direction of the ebbbbbbbbbbbb in front of the ebbbbbbbbba in Busan

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and, even if the signal is changed to the stop signal of the vehicle, caused the collision of the victim D (23 ) who was driven in the direction of the Gupo-ro in the direction of the Gupo-ro in accordance with the Madon e-mail by negligence in violation of the signal, and proceeded to the front part of the left part of the E-Poter vehicle driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports on traffic accidents and written statements on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. A report on investigation (a report on an investigation of an witness of a traffic accident);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine on January 26, 2015 due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents; (b) again caused the instant traffic accident within nine months; and (c) the degree of the injury suffered by the victim is relatively less and less unfavorable to the Defendant.

However, the old age of 73 years of age is not good, and there is a situation that is economically difficult for the defendant to do so, and the defendant paid the victim an agreement with the victim and the victim does not want to be punished.