logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.04.30 2011고단140
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해) 등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 22:00 on September 21, 2009, the Defendant: (a) thought that the victim was approaching another male in the Ecar page operated by the victim D (A. 39 years old), who was the wife of the Defendant in Fabab, at the time of Fabling C; and (b) committed the assault against the victim by pushing the body of the victim by babbing the body of the victim during the dispute with the victim.

2. Around 23:00 as of December 23, 2009, the Defendant damaged the 253,000 won of the market price by breaking the stone with the victim’s 404 parking lot, which had been in dispute with the victim D at the F apartment 404 parking lot.

3. Around 02:10 on May 21, 2010, the Defendant: (a) was waiting for D in front of a company bank adjacent to the above Ecarpet; (b) was waiting for D with the victim H (37 years of age); and (c) the victim was flicking the Defendant with his/her horse hand, and flicked and flicked the part of the victim’s right, such as the victim’s right, on the part of the victim in his/her possession during the process.

As such, the Defendant committed violence against the victim, and thereby caused the victim to open the right side of the victim, which requires treatment for about 10 days.

4. Around 06:40 on May 27, 2010, the Defendant suspected of having a relation between the victim H (37 years of age) and D within the Impo-si Impo-si on May 27, 2010, and caused an empty beer’s injury during the dispute between the victim H (37 years of age) and D, and led the victim to an open wound where the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim.

5. Around 02:00 on June 8, 2010, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the entrance door of the above Kapet was set off in front of the above Kapet; (b) made phone calls to the victim D; and (c) took a brick in and around the surrounding Kapet toward a glass window, and went into the said door.

In the end, it is eventually.

arrow