logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.05.12 2012고단6223
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five months, for six months, and for four months, for defendant C, respectively.

Defendant

A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] On October 28, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon District Court and three years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 5, 2010.

Defendant

B On June 15, 2010, the Suwon District Court was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 28, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendants, around July 21, 2006, lent KRW 100 million to the victim F (G before the opening name) at the above E-real estate office, “If the Defendants lent KRW 100 million to the victim F for the completion of the construction of the I building building on the land of three parcels, such as Ha in Y, the Defendants shall repay the principal and interest KRW 20 million until October 30, 2006, and if the Defendants are unable to repay, they shall transfer the ownership of the said I building to the said stores of subparagraphs 3 and 4.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not have any intent or ability to repay money even if they borrowed money from the victims due to the absence of any particular property. Meanwhile, around August 25, 2004, the Defendants received an investment of KRW 400 million from the J as the construction cost for the said I building and the construction cost for the new construction of the I building and agreed with the J to repay a total of KRW 500 million including the principal and interest from the end of November 2004, and if they are unable to repay, they agreed to transfer the said I building and the said I building and the said site ownership. To secure this, the Defendants issued the J with the name change necessary for the transfer of ownership and the registration of preservation of the ownership of the land and the building and the written consent for the waiver of the building, and thus there was no intention or ability to transfer

Nevertheless, on July 21, 2006, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim as above, and then acquired 100 million won from the bank account in the name of K designated by the Defendants to the bank account in the name of K.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective statements in the protocol of trial

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. (Implementations) Each note, (cash) any written commitment, any written commitment for performance;

arrow