Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On May 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 05:15, on the front of the Daegu Jung-gu Cmate on the road, on the ground that the victim D (the age of 28) and the victim E (the age of 28) interfered with the course of the Ecoo vehicle operated by the Defendant and do not turn off the path; (b) was sprinking down several times, leading the victim E into the bottom; (c) opened the bottom, leading the bottom; and (d) opened the sphere and opened the sphere beyond the floor, cutting down the sphere and the sphere beyond the bottom, and sphering the sphere and the sphere of the sphere to the victim D with approximately two weeks of needing treatment; and (d) followed the victim E for about 14 days of treatment, damaged the sphere of the sphere for which treatment is required.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter (investigative records, 45 pages, 55 pages);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant alleged to the effect that the above act constitutes self-defense and thus, the illegality of the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is denied. However, in full view of the form of the act of the instant crime, the background of the crime, the situation at the time of the crime, the degree of the victim’s situation, etc., it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant’s act was an act committed with the intent of attack beyond the mere means of defense, and it cannot be deemed as a self-defense. Thus,