The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant of mistake of facts is merely a unilateral assault from the victim, and did not see the victim's blick with flick hand or glick with flick with the victim's blick.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant asserted the same purport in the lower court’s judgment regarding the assertion of mistake of facts.

The defendant's assertion is that the defendant did not frighten the victim's hand or frighten the victim's neck with frighten hand, and only frighten the victim's breath with frighten, and frighten the victim's breath, thereby deciling the part of the victim's bat, but this constitutes legitimate self-defense to avoid violence of the victim.

The court below held that the defendant's act of assaulting against the victim during the process of attacking with the victim in the course of attacking the victim's neck with spath and spath, thereby preventing the victim's spathn with the victim's spathn's spathn's spathn's spathn's spathn's spathn, and continuously recognized the defendant's spathn's spathn's spathn's spathn with the spathn's spathn's spathn with the victim's spathn with the victim's spathn's spathn with the victim's spathn with the victim's spathn's sn

Examining the above judgment of the court below in comparison with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, it can be recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the judgment below, while the defendant's act does not constitute self-defense or legitimate act.