1. Of the part concerning the principal lawsuit in the judgment of the court of first instance, the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) that exceeds the following amount ordered to pay.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the basic facts is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal as follows, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

On the third and third sides of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the construction period of KRW 260,700,000" is "the extension of the construction period to October 6, 2014".

In the third chapter of the judgment of the court of first instance, “C. 426,369,739 won,” “C. 386,352,101 won,” and “C. 426,369,739 won (However, this seems to be a clerical error in the calculation of KRW 426,369,745)” are indicated as “C. 426,369,745 won,” and “C. 426,369,745 won in total as “C. 40,00 won in common facilities, 40,017,644 won in common, 380 won in total, 386,352,101, 104, 107, 179, 1745 won in total, 196, 47, 197, 305 won in total, 47, 197, 405 won in total construction site.

On April 30, 2019, the first instance court held that “the total amount of KRW 1,152,643,314,” “the steel reinforced concrete construction work 1,152,643,314,” and “the total amount of KRW 398,429,323, labor cost 696,84,820, labor cost 57,369,171,” and “the total amount of KRW 46,524,544,” and “the total amount of KRW 1,52,643,314,” and “the total amount of KRW 398,429,323, labor cost 69,369,171,” which were written in the first instance judgment (see, e.g., the page 8). However, the Defendant asserts to the effect that the legal brief as of April 30, 2019 includes KRW 46,524,