logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.05.10 2018고단126
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants and D, at around 02:50 on August 6, 2017, changed the chests of the Victim F (22 years old) and the Victim G (22 years old) from the elevator of the Dong-gu building E-gu, Yongsan-gu, U.S., U.S., to the chests of the Victim F (22 years old).

In the end, “A” in the first floor of the above E-building 1, when the Defendant was satisf and was satisf of the victim F’s fat, and the Defendant B threatened the victim F with her hatf’s satisf, and continued to be satisfing the victim F’s hatf’s hatf’s hatf’s hat at the first floor of the 1st floor of the Japan-dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, the Defendant A was tightd with the victim F’s hatf’s hatf’s hatf’s hatf’s hat, and the Defendant D was satf’s hat at one time as a drinking.

Accordingly, Defendants and D assaulted Victim F and Victim G jointly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, internal investigation reports (on-site inspection, etc.), and investigation reports (the investigation of the party concerned) taken of damaged parts;

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants committed the instant crime while serving a suspended sentence of 2 months on September 22, 2016, under the sentence of 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the Defendants were sexual harassment and assaulted by many victims who resisted the sentence, etc.; Defendant B committed the instant crime while serving a suspended sentence of 2 years on the ground that he was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on September 22, 2016 due to the certificate of breach of trust in the form of imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months.

However, the defendants are against each of the crimes of this case.

arrow