logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.01 2015가단5049784
임대차보증금
Text

1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

A. The cost of installing a 3,500,000 won wall installation cost is KRW 2,50,000 CCTV installation cost of KRW 1.5 million for KRW 3,40,000 for KRW 3,90,000 for KRW 3.9 million for KRW 3,559,520 for KRW 4,000 for KRW 5,000 for KRW 4,000 for KRW 4,326,00 for KRW 5,00 for KRW 3,90 for KRW 3,520 for KRW 4,520 for KRW 5,00 for KRW 3,526,00 for KRW 3,9

B) In a case where the rescission of a contract is acknowledged on the ground of the nonperformance of the obligation of the council of occupants’ representatives, the council of occupants’ representatives of Defendant B lending bears the obligation to reinstate under Article 548(1) of the Civil Act to the Plaintiff, and is liable for damages under Article 390 of the Civil Act. Therefore, the council of occupants’ representatives of Defendant B lending, as a performance of the duty to restore, did not directly pay 1,510,000 won (including management expenses) for the lease deposit received under the instant lease agreement and 5,100,000 won (including management expenses) paid for six months from December 2013 to May 2014, 2014, including 8,510,000 won = (116,510,000 won per month) / (15,235,520 won per year) / (135,520 won per year) / 5,015,000 won or directly paid the Defendants at the time of this case.

2) The Plaintiff: (a) ordered E to engage in the cosmetic retail business in the leased object of this case; (b) registered the business as a cosmetic retail business; and (c) the instant lease agreement was not concluded in consideration of the inconvenience that the Plaintiff would have caused to the residents when considering the inconvenience that the building of this case would engage in the skin management shop in the building of this case. The Defendants did not deceiving the Plaintiff in relation to the conclusion of the instant lease agreement. (c) The Plaintiff had attempted to operate the skin management shop in the building of this case.

arrow