logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.10.28 2016고정818
협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From August 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) leased one column of warehouse located in Busan, the husband D; and (b) installed a singing machine from around May 24, 2015, in which the Defendant received a demand from the victim to cover the said warehouse over several occasions; (c) requested the victim to compensate for the costs of installing singing machines and the interior costs; and (d) caused conflicts with the victim.

1. On June 25, 2015, the Defendant threatened the victim with the following purport: “Around June 16, 2015, the Defendant did not refund the costs of installing the singinginging machine and the interior costs, etc. from the front of the above H’s restaurant in the name of “H” in the building owned by the building located in the Busan metropolitan area G; and on June 25, 2015, at the front of the above H’s restaurant, the Defendant: (a) discarded the victim’s 1 and the second floor of the 1st and the second floor of the 1st floor of the singing bank; and (b) reported the non-reported general restaurant business to the end of the restaurant.”

2. Around 09:00 on June 26, 2015, the Defendant threatened the victim with the following purport: (a) on the front of the instant “H” restaurant, the Defendant: (b) was in dispute with the victim, such as the cost of installing a singing machine and the reimbursement of the interior cost; and (c) the Defendant was threatening the victim to the effect that “I will leave the 1 and the 2nd floor of the 1st floor of the 1st century, by drawing up the door, and throw away the 1st and the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor; and (d) the Defendant continued to report the general restaurant business

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The Defendant asserted as follows: “The Defendant did not commit intimidation to the victim on the ground that there was no difference in the fact that he met the victim at the time of the instant crime or made telephone conversations.” The facts acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, and ① C is the Defendant’s difference.

arrow