logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.01.29 2019누52890
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court cites the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons stated in the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it cites it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 4

(The plaintiff is basically repeating the same argument in the court of first instance. The plaintiff's claim in this case is justified even if the plaintiff's argument partially supplemented in the court of first instance was examined in consideration of the allegations that have been partially supplemented in the court of first instance). 2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim in this case is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of first instance is justified in conclusion, and the plaintiff

arrow