logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.02.15 2018고단3900
전자금융거래법위반
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2. One unit (No. 1) of the seized B mobile phone, one check of C Bank C Bank, D, and documentary evidence.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall borrow or lend a means of access or keep, deliver or distribute a means of access, knowing that he/she is to be used for a crime or to be used in a crime.

Nevertheless, if a person, who is the name card of a Boscing organization in China, instructs the defendant to receive a physical card under the name of another person through H, etc., the defendant would receive 80,000 won per case, even though he/she is aware that the relevant physical card is to be used for the crimes of Boscing, and the defendant received and kept a copy of K bank Cbank Card (D) and E Bank Body Card (F) from J on September 11, 2018 at the front of the Gu Government City, and at around 13:00 on the same day, he/she received and kept a copy of NBC Card (O) from N in the front of the M sales outlet in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with one infinite, kept the means of access for criminal use.

No person shall borrow or lend a means of access, or keep, deliver or distribute a means of access, knowing that he/she is to be used for a crime or to be used for a crime.

Nevertheless, if the Defendant instructed the Defendant, through H, to receive a physical card under the name of another person, from the person who was unable to receive the name of the upper-party of the Bosing organization operating in China, the Defendant, despite being aware that the relevant physical card was to be used for the Bosing crime, received the payment of KRW 80,000 per case, and around August 3, 2018, the Defendant received and kept a physical card from Q from the old-party of the Yeonsu-gu Incheon P Housing to Q Q bank account (R) around August 14, 2018.

Accordingly, the defendant kept the means of access for the purpose of using the crime in collusion with the person who was not injured.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 3900"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The protocol of statement by the police against S.

arrow