Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are the staff of the law office H who was requested by the husband G of Seocho-gu Seoul EF to file a divorce lawsuit.

The Defendants voluntarily prepared a letter of delegation with G to use the F in divorce litigation, attached to the application form for the use of the cadastral computerized data for personal applicants, and submitted it to the Gu office to find out the current status of F real estate in order.

Accordingly, at the office of law around October 17, 2013, Defendant A, using a computer, printed out the proxy form on the Yongsan-gu office website, and printed out it to G. Defendant B stated “F, I, and J Apartment apartment apartment apartment unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit, and

G submitted a forged letter of delegation at the Gu L Office in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-ro 43-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, as shown above, to the public official M in charge of being aware of the fact as a document duly formed, along with an application for the use of intellectual data for personal applicants.

As a result, the Defendants forged a letter of delegation in F without authority for the purpose of uttering in collusion with G and used a forged private document in F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement and Defendant B’s partial legal statement

1. Statement;

1. To know the provision of cadastral computerized data under the name of the head of Gu;

1. Proxy letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to applications for access to cadastral computerized data for individuals;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants who choose a sentence: Articles 231, 30 (the occupation of a commission of private document and a fine), 234, 231, and 30 (the occupation of exercising the said investigation document, the choice of a fine) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants who aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: the Criminal Act.