1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked, respectively.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as follows, and the part concerning the claim for overtime allowances (as stated in No. 32, No. 18) is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the claim for overtime allowances (as stated in No. 32, No. 32, No. 18) is re-written as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is (excluding the part concerning the co-

Part 27, "Attachment 5 through 69 (hereinafter referred to as "attached 5 to 69")" in attached Forms 18 (Plaintiff C) and 56 (Plaintiff BS (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s Attached 18”) shall be attached Forms 13 through 18 (hereinafter referred to as “attached 31”) and the defendant shall be liable to pay to the plaintiffs the unpaid statutory allowances and unpaid holiday work allowances in attached Forms 3 through 8 and 32, 12 through 17 (hereinafter referred to as “the defendant shall be liable to pay damages for delay of the principal” in attached Forms 1 through 12 of the judgment of the plaintiff, and each part of the attached Forms 13 through 18 of the judgment of the court below shall be paid to the plaintiffs as the total amount of damages for delay of the principal stated in attached Tables 1 and 12 of the judgment of the plaintiff’s Attached 13 (the total amount of damages for delay of the plaintiff’s attached 1).

2. Part to be used again; and

A. Article 50(1) and (2) of the Labor Standards Act relating to the legal doctrine relating to the time limit for the extension of overtime hours (a) is one week.