The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal lies in the fact that the Defendant carried the fat and fat with the victim, but the Defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim, such as the facts charged in this case, but the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case by misunderstanding the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in the court below: ① the victim’s statement at the investigative agency and court of the court below, which correspond to the facts charged in this case, are specific and consistent and credibility; ② the witness at the time at the time stated that the investigation agency deemed the victim’s eye with the victim’s eye; ② the witness at the time at the time was not clear; but at the time at the time at the time at the court of the court below, the defendant stated in the investigation agency to the effect that the memory was unsatisfy, and the victim was flick (which seems to have been flick with the snow), ③ the victim stated to the effect that the eye was unsatisfy, and ③ the victim stated the victim’s eye with the victim’s eye without the victim’s personal information in detail at the investigative agency for three months after the victim was found to be the victim’s perpetrator. In light of the circumstances and circumstances, the victim’s statement was natural, and the victim and the victim were also aware that there was a physical contact with the victim’s injury.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.