Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person serving in a prison in a prison.

Defendant

A At around 19:30 on November 10, 2018, the Defendant told the victim B (the 58-year old) in the official prison C (the 58-year old) with a long-term term of 19:30, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant mard the victim “I wurd the victim without a report of only one minute in his/her south farb,” and (b) the victim fardddd the victim’s side farg, farged the victim’s side farg, farged the victim’s farg, farged the victim’s part on the body of the victim going beyond the floor, and continuously fard the victim’s left side farged the victim’s eye that needs to be treated for about two weeks due to his/her finger.

B. Defendant B: (a) at the time and place of the preceding port, at the victim A (50 years of age) suffered bodily fighting from the Defendant, such as a defect in the development of a route, fele, flaps, etc. of the victim; and (b) knee, knee, feling the victim’s right side; and (c) knee, knee, knee, etc., suffered injury to the victim

2. Determination

A. As evidence consistent with the facts charged by Defendant A, the victim’s statement at the investigative agency and court, D and E investigative agency, the victim’s statement, the injury diagnosis statement, and the injury autopsy photograph, etc.

However, considering the following circumstances revealed by evidence, it is difficult to view that the above evidence alone proves that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim’s eye by flurbing the snow, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(1) A witness E stated in an investigative agency that the defendant has reached a victim’s eye, but this court stated in this court that “the defendant has not correctly memoryed the snow, and there is no statement in the investigative agency as such.”

In F and Gdo investigative agency, a witness, the defendant sees the eye.