1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) placed an order to repair production facilities installed in a factory located in Changwon-si E (hereinafter “instant work”) with the trade name “D” to Defendant C, who is engaged in the mechanical repair business (hereinafter “Defendant B”), and the Plaintiff was employed by Defendant C as a technician and was placed in the work to adjust the equilibrium of the equipment type on September 27, 2014.

B. Among the production facilities installed in the above plant, the term emercator (hereinafter “this case’s machinery”), which is the main production facility of roll Capital, has reached the main weight (weight approximately 100 km) and the original weight (weight approximately 8km) in order to adjust the horizontal plane of roll Capital. However, at the above site, the Plaintiff adjusted the V and the emercuous weight (weight approximately 7 km) connected to chain in order to equal the horizontal plane of roll Capital together with Defendant C at the above site, and additionally installed the emercuous weight (weight approximately 7 km).

In addition, while preparing for a trial operation by cutting down the string which was set up for a fixed, there was an accident that causes the plaintiff's shock while the strings fall.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as double balone balones, and the closure of a plant, which require at least eight weeks of medical treatment due to the instant accident.

[Ground of Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2-2, Eul evidence 2-1 through 3, Gap evidence 3-1, 2-2, Gap evidence 2-1 through 3, Gap evidence 7-1, 2, Gap evidence 8-1, 3, 5, Eul evidence 2-5, Eul evidence 2-1 through 5, Eul evidence 1, part of Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. As to the main cause of the 1st party’s assertion, the Plaintiff asserted that the chain below the main weight of the instant machine was worn out or damaged, and that auxiliary weight was shocked by the Plaintiff while falling away. Defendant B, who was unfolded by the Plaintiff, excessively unbrupted.