1. The plaintiff G's lawsuit is dismissed.

2.(a)

Defendant W is the Plaintiff as indicated in the “Possessor” column of the attached Form of Possession.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or evidence of subparagraph 1-1 through 11, evidence of subparagraph 2-1 through 26, evidence of subparagraph 3-1 through 26, evidence of subparagraph 4, evidence of subparagraph 5, evidence of subparagraph 6-1 through 20, evidence of subparagraph 7-1, 2, evidence of subparagraph 8, evidence of subparagraph 9-1 through 3, evidence of subparagraph 1-2, evidence of subparagraph 3, Eul, evidence of subparagraph 4, evidence of subparagraph 6, evidence of subparagraph 7, evidence of subparagraph 9-1 through 4, evidence of subparagraph 1-2, evidence of subparagraph 1-2, evidence of subparagraph 1-3, evidence of subparagraph 4, evidence of subparagraph 7, evidence of subparagraph 9-1 through 4, evidence of subparagraph 9-1 through 10-2, evidence of subparagraph 1-1, evidence of subparagraph 1-2, evidence of subparagraph 1-2, evidence of subparagraph 1-2, evidence of subparagraph 2-2, evidence of this case

From 1972 to 4,060 square meters (1,28 square meters; hereinafter “the land before the instant partition”) prior to the partition owned by the Defendant Pyeongtaek-si from around 1972, the first buyer sold the land to each of the E, AF, AG, AH, AI, AJ, AJ, networkf, AK, AK,N (AM), AP (PlaintiffN), network Q Qu, AI, Defendant W, and AR (hereinafter “the first buyer”). The first buyer, by specifying each purchase part of the land before the instant partition, occupied each of the land before the instant partition and newly built the housing on that ground.

However, AR has placed the land indicated in Section 15 of the attached Table No. 15, which is one of its specific occupied parts, on the ground of the site, and Defendant Y acquired part of the shares of the above land before it and newly constructed the above building.

B. The land prior to the instant subdivision was partitioned into each land indicated in the separate sheet of land (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) at the time of the first purchaser’s sale to the first purchaser in a mutually consistent manner with the location and size of the occupied part of the first purchaser, and each of the instant land was divided into “each of the instant land.” However, the land was divided into the sequences in the separate sheet of land (hereinafter “instant land”).