logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.07.24 2019고정222
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Class B EF car.

On August 28, 2018, at around 20:48, the Defendant driven the above-mentioned vehicle that was not covered by the mandatory insurance of a motor vehicle, and proceeded along the two-lanes from the direction of the area of the area of the Oralk (U.S.) of the Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon along the two-lanes from the direction of the area of the U.S. (U.K.) to the direction of the motor vehicle.

A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by checking the front side and the left side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the back and back pentle part of the Fmari vehicle driven by the victim E (the age of 32) and the back pentle part of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as salt and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of treatment, and damaged the victim’s vehicle in KRW 1,632,801.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of E;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Mandatory insurance policy;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of an order to submit a medical certificate and a document to the new coal service center of G stock companies;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the selection of fines for each crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da15488, Apr. 1,

arrow