The Defendant posted the summary of the judgment on innocence.

1. The summary of the facts charged has been employed by the Defendant as a caregiver from November 20, 2013 to June 28, 2014, from E in the Gyeongbuk-si, Gyeongbuk-si operated by C.

A. On January 12, 2014, at around 18:00, the Defendant discovered one of the Korean-style cosmetics equivalent to KRW 60,000 at the market price owned by C in the above multi-purpose room, which was working in the E main room, and was stolen by inserting the gaps of C’s attention into a private room.

B. On January 17, 2014, at around 18:00, the Defendant discovered one ball powder equivalent to KRW 18,000 at the market price of C owned by the foregoing multi-purpose room, and then stolen the gaps that C neglected due care.

C. On January 21, 2014, at around 18:00, the Defendant discovered one string of water equivalent to KRW 5,900 at C’s market price and one string of water equivalent to KRW 11,000 at the market price, which was located in the above main use room, and then stolen the cre in which C’s attention was neglected.

On January 28, 2014, at around 18:00, the Defendant discovered one waterproof circulation equivalent to the market price of KRW 5,000, and one head of the front 8,000 and one head of the market price in front of the market price of KRW 8,00, which was owned by C in the above multi-purpose room, and was stolen by inserting the gaps in which C’s attention has been neglected.

E. On February 8, 2014, at around 18:00, the Defendant discovered 1 set straw cans equivalent to KRW 20,000 and 1 set straws equivalent to the market price of KRW 20,000 and 20,000 in the market price, which were held in the above main multi-use room, and stolen them by inserting the crebs in which C’s caution was neglected.

F. At around 18:00 on February 12, 2014, the Defendant discovered a 10,000 Kim St at the market price owned by C, which was located in the above main multi-purpose room, and caused the theft by inserting the gaps in which C’s attention was neglected.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen property equivalent to the total market price of KRW 159,900 over six times.

2. Determination:

A. The facts charged

The Defendant’s judgment on the larceny described in the port is subject to C’s permission and stated in this part of the facts charged.