logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.09.18 2015고단1780
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for four months, for eight months, for eight months, and for six months, for Defendant C.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On May 16, 2013, the Seoul Eastern District Court has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny for five months and has been sentenced to the same year.

8.7 The above judgment was finalized.

Defendant

A, from November 2012, Defendant B, and C, who had no fixed occupation, operated a unregistered loan office in the vicinity of the Bupyeong River basin, were introduced as a person in need of prompt transfer from the real estate agent, and sought a loan by using the credit of Defendant A, who was introduced as a person in need of prompt transfer from the real estate agent, but it was difficult due to low credit rating. As the credit rating was purchased as a used vehicle, the Defendant B and C conspired to raise funds by means of prompt repurchase to the designated vehicle agent after purchasing it as a used vehicle.

Defendant

B purchased a motor vehicle from the used vehicle office in Incheon, and ordered Defendant C and A to purchase the motor vehicle through installment financing, and to raise funds for the large-sized vehicle business operator. Defendant C and A, at the G office located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, on November 6, 2012, stated that Defendant A actually purchased a heavy motor vehicle and that Defendant A applied for a heavy motor vehicle loan on the application form for the set-off of the victim Dongyang Life Co., Ltd., Ltd., which was located in Incheon, and submitted the said victim’s application for the loan to the large-sized vehicle as security, and submitted it to the said victim’s company.

However, in fact, even if Defendant A purchased an automobile through an automobile installment loan, the Defendants only intended to sell it immediately and did not intend to repay the price even if he obtained an automobile installment loan.

As such, the Defendants conspired, by deceiving the victim, led the victim to transfer the amount of KRW 18,00,000 to a corporate bank account in the H name designated by the employees selling high-class automobiles on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements 1.1.

arrow