logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2011. 02. 11. 선고 2010누30972 판결
기술도입대가에 대한 법인세 등의 면제[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2010Guhap22337 (2010.02)

Title

Exemption from corporate tax, etc. on royalties on technical license

Summary

Where a person who provides technology obtains a confirmation of tax exemption by applying for exemption after the expiration of the period for application for tax exemption, the provisions on tax exemption shall apply only to the taxable year for which the application for exemption is filed and the remaining exemption period thereafter, but the amount of tax already paid before receiving the confirmation of

Cases

2010Nu30972 Revocation of revocation of request for rectification

Plaintiff

Dogsan Incorporated Co.

Defendant

O Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2010Guhap22337 decided September 2, 2010

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The decision of the court of first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's disposition of refusal on December 11, 2009 against the claim for correction that the plaintiff exempted the withheld corporate tax of 577,847,160 won paid on May 13, 2008 and requested the refund shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this Court is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this Court cites it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow