A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

If a person makes a disturbing speech or behavior or makes a speech or behavior supporting or opposing a specific political party or candidate within 100 meters from the polling station or polling station, the voting management officer or voting affairs clerk shall restrain it, and if he/she refuses complying therewith, he/she shall be compelled not to withdraw from the polling station or beyond the restricted distance, and if he/she refuses complying therewith, he/she shall not comply with the order of the voting management officer or voting affairs clerk.

On May 4, 2017, the Defendant, at the 19th presidential election D advance polling station in Busan Metropolitan City, which was prepared for the multi-purpose office of the 3rd presidential office in Busan Metropolitan City, on May 4, 2017, and the seal of the ballot box is able to be combined.

The term “instruous speech and behavior” and the term “instruous speech and behavior for about 15 minutes,” and thus, even though the advance polling management officer and advance polling office have been demanded to withdraw from the advance polling office, the advance polling office did not leave the advance polling office.

As a result, the Defendant made a disturbing speech and behavior in the advance polling station, and rejected the advance polling management officer, the advance polling office, and the order to leave the advance polling office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation and investigation into the police;

1. Article 256 (3) 2 (f) and Article 166 (1) of the Act on the Election of Public Officials in Charge of Crimes and Articles 256 (3) 2 (f) and 166 (1) of the Election of Public Officials;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to 4 million won;

2. According to the purport of the Public Official Election Act, the Defendant’s liability is not somewhat poor in light of the following purport: (a) the Defendant’s disturbance in the advance polling lawsuit for the 19th presidential election was avoided; (b) the advance polling management officer, the advance polling office, and the advance polling office’s refusal to comply with the order of expulsion; and (c) the fair and peaceful voting procedures

However, the defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case.