logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.09.05 2017고합132
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

If a person makes a disturbing speech or behavior or makes a speech or behavior supporting or opposing a specific political party or candidate within 100 meters from the polling station or polling station, the voting management officer or voting affairs clerk shall restrain it, and if he/she refuses complying therewith, he/she shall be compelled not to withdraw from the polling station or beyond the restricted distance, and if he/she refuses complying therewith, he/she shall not comply with the order of the voting management officer or voting affairs clerk.

On May 14:10, 2017, the Defendant, at the 19th presidential election E advance polling station located in Suwon-gu, Busan, the 14:10 on May 5, 2017, the 19th presidential election of the 19th presidential election of the 19th presidential election of the Republic of Korea, in which the Defendant is performing the duties of managing the ballot box without any special reason under the influence of alcohol, is not in a large interest.

“A disturbing speech and behavior,” such as “Admonishing speech and behavior,” and thus, the advance polling management officer G and advance polling office H, and I demanded to leave the advance polling office, but a about 10 minutes continuous disturbance was avoided, and did not leave the advance polling office in advance polling.

As a result, the Defendant made a disturbing speech and behavior in the advance polling station, and rejected the advance polling management officer, the advance polling office, and the order to leave the advance polling office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, I, H, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing voting management in advance polling stations;

1. Article 256 (3) 2 (f) and Article 166 (1) of the Act on the Election of Public Officials in Charge of Crimes and Articles 256 (3) 2 (f) and 166 (1) of the Election of Public Officials;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to 4 million won;

2. As to the instant crime of sentencing, the Defendant’s disturbance in the advance polling lawsuit for the 19th presidential election is fair and peaceful voting procedure as the Defendant did not comply with the advance polling management officer, advance polling office’s proposal, and eviction order.

arrow