As to the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the defendant, a fine of 50,000 won shall be imposed, and as to the crime No. 2 of the judgment of the defendant, four months shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 8, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (person who committed a crime) at around 22:14, 2015, “D Mart” located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Seoul, with excessive charges, which are dangerous objects, without any particular reason, and returned to the said Mart store and its front path.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects without justifiable reasons.

2. On January 12, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at “F Administrative Welfare Center” located in Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City around 14:30, requesting issuance of a certificate of supply and demand of basic living expenses under the influence of alcohol, and engaging in social welfare-grade public officials of Grade VII (V, 37 years old), who were performing duties, such as the civil petitioner’s response and the issuance of documents, during which he talks with G, i.e., the Defendant “Y Y Y Y Y Z, i.e., a bitch bitch bitch son.”

He shall have a width.

B. A person who threatens to his family is also a knife.

The nature is urgent.

1.3 Does it be equal.

“Intimidating the sound,” the document was served on G, and assaulted.

On the same day, the defendant continuously enters the next center after childbirth about about 10 Shojus around 15:1, and "I wish to drink here."

“Along with sound, I returned to the above center’s proposal. The Defendant, who is a public official of Grade 8 in the administrative service, who is a public official of Grade 7 in the administrative service, and I (35) who is a public official of Grade 7 in the administrative service, was fluencing the Defendant, and “I shall fluencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing fencing that would be a fencing fencing fencing of fencing,” and threatened H and I with fencing fencing fencing that fencing fencing,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of the above public officials on the civil petitioner response and the issuance of documents to the above F Administrative Welfare Center.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;

1. A written statement of G and I;

1. Records of 112 reported, records of notification, copies of a district unit's work site, and records of the processing of photographs, penalties, etc. by capturing CCTVs;

1.Each.