A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for special intimidation by the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the same prison on February 28, 2016.

[2] On April 13, 2018, at the 2nd floor office of the D administrative welfare center located in Bupyeong-si, Bupyeong-si, D administrative welfare and public officials E, F, and counseling with respect to government subsidies, the Defendant left his/her own title by taking out his/her knife, which is a dangerous object for the reason that he/she does not harm the treatment of civil petitions as his/her own intent while counseling with the D administrative welfare and public officials E, F, and continued to use his/her knife with the welfare and public officials G, and whether he/she should have contact with the phone.

“Duplicating the above public officials, such as committing sound.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried a knife, which is a dangerous object, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials of the administrative welfare center on civil petitions.

[Defendant and defense counsel had mental and physical weakness or mental loss due to mental illness under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant case

The argument is asserted.

According to the records of this case, even though the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time, he was investigated by the police immediately after the crime, and the defendant did not drink to the extent that he was dysing one disease per week at the time of occupation.

The defendant stated that the defendant was arrested as the main quantity, and the reason why he was arrested was the knife in the Dong office, and the defendant was arrested as a fact by a public official in the same office.

In light of the fact that the Defendant made a statement by clearly memorying the Defendant’s crime, the Defendant’s act at the time of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the Defendant had lost or weak ability to discern things or make decisions.

【Non-Recognition】

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1.The existing, kacker photographs of No. 1 of the No. 1.